Category Archives: Film Fodder

David Gordon Green and Tye Sheridan are two reasons why this film isn’t your average “Joe”

Joe is a contemporary Southern Gothic story about a down-on-his-luck man named Joe (Nicolas Cage) who, having a regrettable history, is trying to distance himself from his troubled past. After meeting an equally troubled, but optimistic, adolescent named Gary (Tye Sheridan), Joe somewhat reluctantly serves the role of father figure, giving Gary a job amongst his crew of day laborers, protecting him from his abusive father (the late Gary Poulter) and teaching hard-living life lessons to a kid who’s already done a good bit of living himself. The film (now available on Blu-ray and DVD) is based on a novel by Larry Brown and became a film festival and art house favorite. Before the movie’s recent Atlanta Film Festival opening night screening, Wrestling with Pop Culture got to talk to Sheridan and director David Gordon Green about their powerful cinematic creation.

Tye, his is the second year in a row you had a pretty major film in the Atlanta Film Festival, and your roles in Mud and Joe were pretty similar. What attracts to these roles where you play adolescent characters that have already done a lot of living?

Photo by Ryan Green.

Tye Sheridan in “Joe”. Photo by Ryan Green.

Sheridan: For a while the only thing I could get cast in was a Southern drama because people were like, “Ah, he has an accent. He won’t be able to do this film.” I was auditioning a lot, but these seemed to be the only films I was getting. But I really like these films because I was born and raised in Texas, my family’s from the South and I feel like I represent my family well. They like to see me in these films and it’s been fun.

As a director, what was it like directing a character like Gary?

Green: I’m always drawn to youthful roles. Most of my films have young characters in them and that’s something that’s always been appealing to me. When I saw Tye’s first performance in Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life, it really caught my eye as somebody to watch out for. That was my favorite part of that movie was, as epic and spiritual as the movie got, for me it was kept grounded by this portrait of youth. I really loved what Tye did in that. Then I was in the editing room on Mud when Jeff [Nichols] was putting that together and I just watched as that movie was being assembled [and thought], “OK, he’s really taking the next step and becoming a strong young actor.”

It’s nice to have an actor with acting ability, but I certainly don’t need it. I’ve spent a lot of my career working with non-actors and nontraditional performers. Formal acting experience and training means very little to me. But finding the right face and voice means everything. I saw hundreds of kids that came in and auditioned … but what Tye had was the physicality, the life experience, the accent and he really understood the core of this character and could relate to not only the region where the character’s from, but how these domestic situations would affect a kid of that age realistically. That’s so much more important to me is an actor that brings you ideas and value rather than just memorize the script and tell you what you want to hear. This is a story based on the legendary Larry Brown’s wonderful piece of literature. But at the same time, a movie is a movie and we’re trying to find the naturalism and breath life into the words that are spoken, the images that are shot. And Tye did an excellent job of bringing Gary Jones to life.

Given the nontraditional means by which you tend to make your films, what was the rehearsal process like for Joe?

David Gordon Green directing "Joe". Photo by Linda Kallerus.

David Gordon Green directing “Joe”. Photo by Linda Kallerus.

Green: A traditional rehearsal process would be of interest in specific projects, if I was going to do an adaptation of a Shakespeare play or something that I think there’s a value to those words. For me, the rehearsal process is the value to these characters and their relationships. So, my rehearsal is let’s go out and get beer and pizza and introduce Tye to Nicolas Cage. Tye wasn’t drinking beer. He was drinking Pepsi. But, you know, lighten up, get to know each other, find out what makes us tick and make it so that I’ve got the psychological tools to do my job, to pull what I find is natural and comfortable out of an actor. It’s not memorizing lines, looking into mirrors and ping-ponging how we’re going to block it. I want this to be intuitive and instinctive.

So there’s a bit of improvisation involved?

Green: There’s a substantial amount of improv. The whole sequence with Tye and Nic as they’re driving around and Nic had this idea of, “Hey, I have this lighter. Charm them with the lighter and tell them about my cool face.” All that stuff is the humanity of Tye and Nic knowing each other and coming up with weird ideas. Some of my favorite lines of the movie aren’t in the script; it’s just two actors that know how to riff and have fun with it.

You just mentioned how you like to use people who aren’t actors. I understand the late Gary Poulter was homeless before starring in this film. How did you find him?

Green: My casting directors met him at a bus stop in downtown Austin. He’d been without an address for a number of years and we brought him in. He originally auditioned for the guy cutting up the deer in one scene. I was like, “Great! That’s awesome. That’s a one-day role. I want you to try the two-day role of the guy who runs the convenience store, Mr. Coleman. Do you want to read for Mr. Coleman?” He comes in the next day and, “Alright, you nailed Mr. Coleman, too. Fantastic. I have a weird idea. You want to read for the third lead in the movie that we’re talking to big-name actors and getting submissions from Hollywood agents about?” Some very well respected actors were up for the role and I was talking to them seriously about doing it. So he comes in a few days later and just nails  it. He brought something electric to it that I couldn’t deny. People talk about the risk involved and we certainly had some concerns and wanted to make sure the guy was happy and healthy and in a good situation. We discovered he was making smart decisions for himself, cleaning up his act and working hard to redeem himself, yet could bring some of the demons of his life to the role and use it to kind of exorcise those. So it was a real positive experience for all of us, working with Gary.

Was that intimidating for you, not working with a trained actor?

Nicolas Cage and Tye Sheridan in "Joe". Photo by Linda Kallerus.

Nicolas Cage and Tye Sheridan in “Joe”. Photo by Linda Kallerus.

Sheridan: I wouldn’t say intimidating, but it definitely keeps you on your toes. That’s something that’s always been a passion of mine is improvising. David mentioned how we would throw each other ideas and improv a little bit and just kind of feed off of each other. That’s one of the coolest things about acting. He was a really good actor and such a sweet guy and a good person. I wish he would have made it long enough to see the final cut. It breaks my heart.

Green: That whole scene when Gary is popping and locking and breakdancing, that’s all just Gary and Tye freestyling with two cameras on. We let them loose and they just came up with all of that. Ultimately, actors don’t necessarily have to have gone to Juilliard and had formal training. An actor is a person with charisma and confidence and something to offer. I would be a terrible actor because I get very self conscious in front of microphones, much less cameras. But Gary had those things to exhibit and it was amazing to be able to have the opportunity to explore that with him in a brief chapter of his life.

How did you prepare for this role that involves and abusive father and other hardships?

Sheridan: Preparation for a role is different each time you do a film or a different character. I read this script a couple of times and I really loved it and really felt in tune with what the story was and who the characters were. So, I didn’t really want to mess with that until I got into rehearsal with Nic and David. Then we started figuring out the characters. I don’t feel like you can fully understand the character until you’re in his clothes, in his house and on set.

Green: That’s how we began production was with that [opening] scene. It was kind of an interesting initiation into my process, in a weird way, to let Tye and Gary get into the most difficult scene in the movie on the first day of production. It was important for me to use that as the foundation for how these characters connect to each other. Again, it’s loosely scripted, but it’s really heightened by the gusto of these two performers. So we could always refer back to that through the whole movie, even during the lighthearted scenes.

I get the impression a lot of the members of the work crew are also not traditional actors. 

Sheridan: A lot of them are not actors. Can you tell who was an actor and who wasn’t.

No, I can’t say that I could.

Sheridan: Good. That means David’s done his job. I think he did a great job of balancing actors and non-actors.

What was it like working with so many people who aren’t traditional actors and why is that important to you, especially in a film like Joe?

David Gordon Green directs Nicolas Cage in "Joe". Photo by Linda Kallerus.

David Gordon Green directs Nicolas Cage in “Joe”. Photo by Linda Kallerus.

Sheridan: It’s really cool. You don’t get that opportunity a lot in most films. That’s one of David’s signature moves is casting non-actors. It keeps you on your toes because they’re always improvising and saying things. Half the time they don’t even know what they’re doing and you just have to roll with it.

Green: It depends on the role. For a role like Joe, you need that gravitas, you need a movie star, you need somebody that brings a resume and a perception about himself, and Nic fit those shoes really well. Other times you need guys that are playing laborers and I wanted them to speak the vernacular and swing an ax the way that a hard-working man would. So it was good to go down to day labor centers and places where we could find the real deal and guys that I can learn from, guys that I’m not telling them what to say or how to say it. They can say their thing, do their thing and make it feel authentic.

So which ones were and were not “real” actors?

Sheridan: There was one crew worker named Sammy who was an actor. He was the only one out of the work crew. Actually, I think they had to cut a couple of his scenes because you could kind of differentiate between him and the rest of the crew being an actor with non-actors. Originally there was a scene where he and Joe get into a fight, but they had to cut that one.

How was Austin as a shooting location for you?

Green: The novel takes place outside of Oxford, Mississippi, which is a beautiful backdrop and something we considered doing. It’s Larry Brown’s neck of the woods and it was a very personal project for him. I had just recently moved to Austin and was exploring my own back yard and it felt like the right place. I knew I had the resources to tap into an authenticity here and find unexploited voices and unseen locations and things like that. I felt a great stability by being able to make a movie this difficult, which was challenging in a thousand ways, but be able to sleep in my own bed at night and be able to ground myself and center myself by not necessarily being a foreigner in a community, but being familiar with it.

Did you and Nic really go out and do location scouting?

Nicolas Cage and Tye Sheridan in "Joe". Photo by Ryan Green.

Nicolas Cage and Tye Sheridan in “Joe”. Photo by Ryan Green.

Green: Yeah. I wrote him a letter and said, “Hey, man. I want you to read this script. I’d love to talk to you about this project.” Cage was on my mind from the get go because Robert Mitchum had passed away and this was the only person I thought could fill his shoes, that had that kind of physical charisma, humor within him and dramatic ability. He called me maybe three days after I’d sent the letter and he’d read the book twice already. This dude was pumped. He was like, “I’m getting on a plane and coming to see you.” I was like, “Whoa, whoa! Wait. I’m location scouting for this other movie.” He was like, “I’m coming. Get the baby seats out of the backseat because I’m laying down.” So he came out and it was fun. We just drove around looking for locations for the Prince Avalanche project I was preparing to film at the time and we just got to know each other and talked about Joe and talked about Larry Brown and wandered around the trees. It would be fun because we’d be off on a little day hike and he’d come across a crew of road workers that would be re-seeding the state park after it had burned and he’d walk up and ask some of the work crew questions about it. Then they’d turn around and see Nicolas Cage and you’d see the stunned road crew. It was amazing.

A lot of your earlier stuff was drama. What made you want to go back to dramas after all the big comedies you’ve been doing?

Green: Ideally we would go back and forth. I’ve done a few movies, then we had a really nice run with our HBO series Eastbound & Down, where I could do a movie, then a season, a movie, then a season. Going from comedy to comedy, I’d get drained. I’m always digging for new things to make me laugh and that would be appropriate for comedic material. Drama, I’ve got wells of it. I’ve got wells of emotion, so I use comedy as a way to recharge because I don’t want to be stuck in a gloomy, melancholy head all day. Nobody does. So you go into it and make things as honestly and sincerely as you can in the dramatic world, then you lighten up with some absurdity. If that’s jumping into a Pineapple Express after a Snow Angels or jumping into an Eastbound & Down season three after Avalanche and right before Joe, wrap Joe and jump into season four of Eastbound, then jump into this [Al] Pacino drama that I just finished filming; it’s a fun way to lighten it up. It’s important for my sanity, more than anything, to keep a healthy balance of expression and expulsion.

Being a younger actor, what keeps you grounded and out of the tabloids and TMZ?

Sheridan: No one really cares about me. I live at home with my parents and have great parents. They’re both really supportive of my career and what I want to do in life. They’re my backbone.

As a young actor, who are some of the actors that inspired you or that you look up to?

Sheridan: When I got into film I was very young. I was at an age where I wasn’t even interested in film, so I think the first actors I looked up to were the ones I was working with, which was Brad Pitt, Sean Penn and Jessica Chastain. Jessica Chastain became, like, my second mom after I shot this movie called The Tree of Life. We remained really close and she’s a really good friend of mine.

Are there any actors you’d like to work with in the future?

Sheridan: I’ve always wanted to work with James Franco. There’s been a couple of things where it was, like, almost. But his schedule didn’t work. He’s doing a lot of stuff and I just think he’s a really interesting person and a bit of a mystery.

There’s a pretty gruesome dog fight scene in Joe. How did you pull that off? Were they trained dogs?

Green: You see dogs all the time as they play. You just get two mean-looking dogs, have them play and replace the sound effects with mean sound effects, then shoot it in slow motion so you can’t see the wagging tails as much. They’re not the smiliest of dogs. Nicolas’ dog Faith was a discovery, she was a new performer. The other dog she goes to play with was a professional dog because he had to do some very savage thing on camera and close up. So we wanted to make sure that was somebody we all felt good about. Particularly me because while I was location scouting for the movie, probably wandering where I shouldn’t, and I got bitten on the hand by a dog. It was pretty brutal. I’d never been attacked by a dog before. It was pretty interesting. And I was just being sweet and trying to pet it!

www.joefilm.net

The Walking Dead Escape brings “The Walking Dead” to life in Atlanta

The Walking Dead EscapeIn The Walking Dead, we see zombies terrorizing Atlanta and other parts of Georgia while a handful of survivors find inventive ways of eluding their undead aggressors. On May 31 The Walking Dead Escape brings its touring zombie spectacle to Philips Arena for the first time  in conjunction with Wizard World Atlanta Comic Con.

This immersive event is a cross between a traditional Halloween haunted attraction and an obstacle course, allowing you to take part either as a spectator, a survivor or a walker. Survivors have to make their way through realistic post-apocalyptic settings in hopes of getting to the decontamination zone without being infected. Professional makeup artists turn walkers into the living dead, who then have to go through zombie training before their hunt begins. Spectators just watch it all happen, which sounds kind of boring given the other options. It sounds a lot like Atlanta Zombie Apocalypse with a bigger budget.

Photo courtesy WWE.

Photo courtesy WWE.

With The Walking Dead stars Norman Reedus, Michael Rooker and Keith Brooks across the street at Wizard World, don’t be surprised if some of the show’s real stars show up at for The Walking Dead Escape. But even if they’re not able to make it, there will be some other legendary personalities on hand to sign autographs and meet fans. Darryl McDaniels of Run DMC will be there and WWE Hall of Famer Booker T will be taking photos from 7:30 p.m.-9:30 p.m. What DMC and Booker T have to do with zombies, I don’t know. But I’m going to try my darndest to get Booker to say, “I’m coming for you, zombies!” Marquese Scott and his Dragon House dance crew will also be doing “Thriller”-esque dance performances in zombie makeup at 9 p.m.

Wrestling with Pop Culture will be joined by Monstrosity Championship Wrestling ring announcer and Needless Things‘ own Phantom Troublemaker for a jaunt through Escape. So listen to Georgia Wrestling Now on June 2 to hear my thoughts on The Walking Dead Escape. www.thewalkingdeadescape.com

“Muppets Most Wanted” is a good (not great) Muppet caper

Muppets Most WantedWhen the Muppets returned to the big screen in 2011, the felt-covered familiarity of Kermit, Miss Piggy, Fozzie Bear and the rest of the gang was fully realized by director James Bobin. With Muppets Most Wanted, Bobin returns to the director’s chair for a sequel that picks up where The Muppets left off, taking the show on the road for a world tour, but leaving a bit of that Muppets magic behind.

Under the guidance of new manager Dominic Badguy (Ricky Gervais), the Muppets take The Muppet Show to some of Europe’s biggest cities. Once they arrive, however, they find that Badguy (pronounced Badgee) has booked them in the worst hole-in-the-wall dives he could find. Not only that, but Kermit suddenly has an Eastern European accent and takes on a much more menacing persona soon after the Muppets arrive in Europe. As his name so blatantly implies, Badguy is not to be trusted as he is in cahoots with Constantine, the world’s number one criminal who, aside from a Robert De Niro-like facial mole, is Kermit’s Russian doppelgänger. Having kidnapped and framed Kermit by slapping a fake mole on his face (and covering his own mole with green makeup), Constantine assumes control of the Muppets while Kermit makes some new friends inside the Siberian prison he now calls home.

Kermit becomes fast friends with WWE's Hornswoggle, Nadya (Tina Fey) and others in "Muppets Most Wanted".

Kermit becomes fast friends with WWE’s Hornswoggle, Nadya (Tina Fey) and others in “Muppets Most Wanted”.

Kermit quickly endears himself to the likes of Ray Liotta, Danny Trejo and WWE‘s Hornswoggle, as well as Nadya (Tina Fey), the officer overseeing this Gulag who already has a Piggy-like fascination with Kermit. Constantine, however, has a harder time fitting in with the rest of the Muppets, whose morale is steadily decreasing under Badguy and Constantine’s leadership. Thankfully, CIA agent Sam the Eagle and Interpol‘s Jean Pierre Napoleon (Ty Burrell) are on the case. Unfortunately, their nationalistic rivalry hinders their investigation, but does provide some comical moments.

Though it takes them a while, Walter, Fozzie and Animal figure out what’s going on and “quit the Muppets” to go spring Kermit from Siberia. But with Piggy planning to marry Constantine (thinking he’s Kermit, of course), time is running out for the Muppets. Though they haven’t seen a caper of this magnitude since 1981’s The Great Muppet Caper, the Muppets just don’t provide as many laugh-out-loud moments in Muppets Most Wanted as they have in other Muppet movies. With numerous catchy musical moments, plenty of the witticisms Muppet fans have come to expect and obligatory cameos by the likes of Lady Gaga, Celine Dion, Salma Hayek and Usher, all the ingredients are there for another great Muppet caper. But there just seems to be something missing with Muppets Most Wanted that leaves it only being a good, or maybe even really good, Muppet caper.

muppets.disney.com/muppets-most-wanted

How do you spell a comically inappropriate directorial debut? “Bad Words”

Photo by Sam Urdank/Focus Features.

Photo by Sam Urdank/Focus Features.

 

 

As an actor, Jason Bateman has always exuded a charming sense of sarcasm that makes the characters he plays likable even when they probably shouldn’t be. He originally made a name for himself as a smartass child and adolescent in the likes of Silver SpoonsThe Hogan Family and Teen Wolf Too. More recently, his wit has endeared him to a younger generation in films like Juno and Extract and television’s Arrested Development. Now Bateman makes his directorial debut with Bad Words, a film that sees him return to his child acting roots. Well, sort of.

Bateman stars as Guy Trilby, a 40-year-old deadbeat who, to the dismay of preteens and parents across the country, enters and excels in The Golden Quill, a spelling bee competition intended for 8th graders. With the help of aspiring reporter Jenny Widgeon (Kathryn Hahn), Guy finds a semantics error in the spelling bee’s rules that allows him to remain in the competition.

Photo courtesy Focus Features.

Photo courtesy Focus Features.

Refusing to reveal his motivations (even to Jenny, despite their awkwardly intimate relationship), Guy meets opposition in the form of Golden Quill head honchos Dr. Bernice Deagan (Allison Janney) and Dr. Bowman (Philip Baker Hall). Guy, however, is always one step ahead of any obstacle thrown in his path. That is until he meets fellow linguistic competitor Chaitanya Chopra (Rohan Chand), who seems to be the only person unfazed by Guy’s foul mouth and bad attitude. So much so that the two become unlikely pals, with Guy indulging Chaitanya in treats such as ice cream, booze and hiring a prostitute to give Chaitanya his first peek at boobs.

It’s all disgustingly inappropriate, which is exactly what makes it so funny. Guy’s brash behavior is hilarious thanks to Bateman’s wit and dry delivery, but you’d probably want to physically harm this guy if you met him in person. And Chaitanya’s naive optimism softens Guy up enough to make him a little easier to like. As the two spell their way closer to victory, their newfound friendship begins to suffer under the possibility of Guy and Chaitanya being the final contestants. Guy pulls pranks on other rivals, such as squirting a packet of ketchup onto the chair of one female competitor, leaving her mortified at the thought of having her first period in front of an audience. Not that he needs help eliminating his competition; he just finds a twisted enjoyment in embarrassing others. But when he stoops to pulling similar stunts with Chaitanya, it takes their friendly rivalry to sadistically silly new levels.

Photo courtesy Focus Features.

Photo courtesy Focus Features.

By the time Guy reaches the final stages of his plan, Chaitanya figures out a way to thwart it, which becomes its own comedy of errors. But that doesn’t stop Guy from achieving his goal of embarrassing The Golden Quill and its hosts on national TV. And when his motivations are finally spelled out, the whole stunt is somehow understandable. Given Bateman’s propensity for portraying endearingly quirky characters in absurd situations, Bad Words is just what one should expect from his first foray into directing.

www.focusfeatures.com/bad_words

“Dark House” succumbs to suspenseful trappings, but delivers an unexpected ending

Photo courtesy Charles Agron Productions.

Photo courtesy Charles Agron Productions.

Birthdays can often be bittersweet combinations of reveling in one’s own existence while lamenting being one year closer to one’s own demise. But for Nick Di Santo (Luke Kleintank), his 23rd birthday includes a lifetime’s worth of highs and lows in Dark House. On the one extreme, some friends take him to a bar for some birthday drinks, he meets a lovely lady (Alex McKenna) and overcomes his social anxieties enough to end up in bed with said lady later that night. To counter all that, however, Nick pays a depressing visit to a Bedlam-looking mental institution earlier that day, where his mother (while babbling at the walls) almost reveals who Nick’s father is before Nick has a vision of how his mother is going to die (this clairvoyance seems to happen to Nick when he touches certain people, presumably those who are going to die in the near future). Then, after Nick and his ladyfriend finish the birthday copulation, his premonition becomes reality as he finds out his mother has been killed in a fire at the hospital.

Talk about an eventful birthday! Oh, and apparently Nick was so excited to be bringing a girl home that he forgot to use protection because his now-girlfriend is incredibly pregnant when the film jumps forward eight months. Also, his girlfriend’s name is Eve, the first of many biblical references in the film. In addition to having a baby on the way, Nick also finds out that his mother has willed him a house. Not just any house, though. This house is the same one he has been dreaming about and drawing for as long as he can remember, and is still compulsively drawing today.

Photo courtesy Charles Agron Productions.

Photo courtesy Charles Agron Productions.

Naturally, he gets his about-to-burst girlfriend and some other friends together and takes a road trip up I-23 (that number comes up a lot) to the town where this house is located. Turns out there is no town, but there is a dinner where some locals inform Nick that the town and his house washed away in a flood 23 years ago. Then Nick finds a framed picture of his house (covered in a thick film of dust, indicating the Health Department doesn’t stop by too often) and is off to find it once again. After a Blair Witch-like search, Nick finds the house fully intact in the woods. And out comes Seth (who looks familiar, but I didn’t realize was Saw‘s Tobin Bell until the end credits rolled), a haggardly creepy guy who comes across like a homeless street preacher with malicious intent.

Like Nick’s mother and other characters in Dark House, Seth converses with the voice in the air vents and knows something about Nick that Nick is trying to find out. After allowing only Nick inside the house, Seth maintains his cryptic disposition while some zombie-like figures arrive outside to spook Nick’s friends (and a couple of land surveyors that helped them find the house). Nick and his friends flee, these zombie things give chase (in a creepy sideways gallop), one guy ends up with an ax embedded in his anatomy and they all escape to a Twilight Zone-like small town that appears to be abandoned to Nick’s group, but the townspeople can see them. They try to head back home, but somehow end up back at the house in the woods, where they decide to spend the night rather than stay outside and risk being terrorized by the zombie things again.

Photo courtesy Charles Agron Productions.

Needless to say it’s not a peaceful night’s rest, and I’m not spoiling anything by saying that this house gets creepier as the night progresses, and Nick’s group starts to get picked off one by one. If it sounds like Dark House is derivative of previous horror films like Final DestinationDon’t Be Afraid of the Dark and The Cabin in the Woods, that’s because it is. And after Nick has a shocking moment with Eve and their unborn child, there’s a bit of The Omen/Rosemary’s Baby-like foreshadowing of this child’s future.

But despite the many chilling cliché’s employed by Dark House, the film manages to build up to a suspenseful twist that changes the viewer’s perspective on everything that has happened previously. And like any good horror flick, it sets things up perfectly for a sequel.

www.darkhousemovie.com

Kickbacks and small-town politics result in tragedy in “Kids for Cash”

Judge Mark Ciavarella is the center of controversy in "Kids for Cash".

Judge Mark Ciavarella is the center of controversy in “Kids for Cash”.

For one man to triumph over more than 3,000 opponents, each no more than a quarter his age, sounds like a heroic feat. But in the case of Mark Ciavarella, an overzealous judge in small town Pennsylvania, it meant sending thousands of adolescents to jail for typical teenage antics such as making fun of a principal on MySpace or unwittingly riding a stolen scooter. Using the post-Columbine panic to justify his harsh sentencing, Ciavarella initially endeared himself to the residents of Luzerne County until his actions began destroying the lives of many youths and their families.

Charmingly cynical student Hillary unwittingly foreshadows her youthful fate in "Kids for Cash".

Charmingly cynical student Hillary unwittingly foreshadows her youthful fate in “Kids for Cash”.

Having not heard of this case prior to viewing Kids for Cash, a documentary named after the ensuing scandal involving financial kickbacks, at least one teenage suicide and Ciavarella being sentenced to 28 years in federal prison, I didn’t really know where this story was heading. At first, we mostly hear from the parents of some of the victims of Ciavarella’s tyranny, as well as a few of the teenagers themselves. We hear about the shock of being shackled and shuffled into a dangerous environment with hardened criminals (resulting in teenagers being exposed to drugs and alcohol, learning to make explosives and other legitimately criminal behavior when they could have been preparing themselves for college and adulthood), and the sadness of seeing one’s children snatched away in such a horrendous manner.

Kids for Cash at first seems a bit one-sided. That is until we find out that Ciavarella was motivated by more than just tough justice, as he received enormous financial compensation from the builders of the juvenile detention centers being filled by the teens of Luzerne County. Kids for Cash gets really interesting when we actually hear from Ciavarella and his cohorts. At this point it is clear that the filmmakers are attempting to offer both sides of a story that ends up being tragic for everyone involved. While those affected negatively by Ciavarella’s conspiracy find out he has a history of such corrupt behavior, Ciavarella initially shows little, if any, remorse for his actions. But after a dramatic confrontation one grieving mother outside a courthouse, we gradually begin to see Ciavarella realize the affects of his actions.

High school wrestling star Ed is the most tragic victim of Ciavarella's corruption.

High school wrestling star Ed is the most tragic victim of Ciavarella’s corruption.

Ciavarella eventually has an emotional breakdown on camera, realizing that even after destroying the lives of so many, he has nothing to show for it as his impending prison sentence looms. Kids for Cash also shows us where some of these teens and their families are today. Some have adjusted fairly well. Others still suffer from lingering effects including post-traumatic stress disorder or learned behavior/coping crutches that have resulted in additional jail time. And in the most tragic case, a high school wrestling standout resorts to the most devastating means of dealing with his depression. Even with justice finally being served for the oppressors, Kids for Cash shows that some things simply cannot be reversed and even with Ciavarella and others in prison, their actions will always haunt those involved to varying degrees.

www.kidsforcashthemovie.com

Kit Harington does battle with gladiators, politicians and a volcano in “Pompeii”

Milo (Kit Harington) prepares for battle in “Pompeii”. Photo by George Kraychyk.

Best known for his role as Jon Snow in Game of Thrones, Kit Harington is no stranger to fantasy period pieces involving sword fights and fair maidens. But one thing Harington was not accustomed to prior to Pompeii was being the lead actor in a film set amidst a historical disaster that involves political scandal, romance and an uneasy alliance with a fellow gladiator. It’s a difficult balancing act that Harington is able to convincingly pull off as he falls in love with a princess, does battle with Rome’s best gladiators and awaits the eruption of Mount Vesuvius. With the movie now in theaters, Wrestling with Pop Culture chats with Harington about ThronesPompeii and other  upcoming projects.

You started your career on stage, made the jump to TV and now you’re in your first starring film role in Pompeii. What has that process been like? How has each of these experiences prepared you for the next?

It’s been very lucky and it’s been a kind of organic experience. I came from a very theatrical background with classical theater training and expected to find most of my work in British TV. To go from a great leading role in theater, make the jump to American TV, then to be doing films was a strange leap to make. It doesn’t usually happen that way. Now I find myself wanting to return to British projects as much as I can. But it’s been a thrilling ride and this movie, especially getting to play a lead role, was a box to be checked. I really wanted to have lead roles in the future, so proving I could do one was important to me.

Game of Thrones and Pompeii are visually similar, which I’m guessing helped you get the role in Pompeii. How would you say your character on Game of Thrones compares to Milo?

Photo by George Kraychyk.

Photo by George Kraychyk.

I think they actually are quite fundamentally different people. They obviously look similar and they’re both sword-wielding heroes, to an extent. So being on Thrones did help me get this part. But I think whereas my character on Thrones is driven by honor and duty and doing right by people, what appealed to me about this character was that he’s none of those things. He’s purely driven by rage, vengeance and a desire to kill and eventually be killed. It’s kind of a death wish and I liked that in him and the change that happens to him in the movie. Encountering another gladiator and falling in love changed his outlook on things. I think that was the intriguing thing about this character.

Milo develops a bond with Atticus (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje), but has an inevitable clash with him in the near future. How did you balance this rage and fury with the compassion Milo begins to develop for Atticus and the romantic relationship that develops with Cassia (Emily Browning)?

It’s important not to look at him in a modern sense. He’s a man from a different world, a different period, and his family had been killed. So I didn’t want to make him emotionally connected as we know it. He’s a very simple human being in lots of ways, and not exactly an intelligent man as we know it. I thought that was quite appealing and I quite enjoyed that. He has a way of looking at life in the film that’s unique in lots of ways to anything else I’ve seen or read. There are some slightly philosophical discussions that happen about the purpose of it all, then the volcano goes off and renders all life pointless anyway. It’s not your classic love story and it’s not your classic disaster movie in many ways.

You were in the original stage production of War Horse. Were you considered for that role when the film version of War Horse was released a few years ago?

Photo by Caitlin Cronenberg.

Photo by Caitlin Cronenberg.

I was considered for it, but I couldn’t even really contemplate doing it if I’d been offered it, which I wasn’t, because I was buried within Game of Thrones by then. And I felt that I’d finished my journey with War Horse, so it never really came up because it wasn’t something I had decided to do.

Game of Thrones is obviously still a hit, but do you have any other film or TV projects lined up after Pompeii?

I’ve got a few projects coming out. How to Train Your Dragon 2 is an animated movie that comes out in June that I’m doing a voiceover in. There’s a movie called Seventh Son reportedly coming out next year sometime. Season four of Thrones is coming out this year, and hopefully another season of that. And I’m working on a couple of movies this year, which I can’t talk about at the moment, but they should be quite exciting.

Seventh Son appears to be another fantasy based movie.

Yeah. I feel like I need to put the lid on fantasy for a little while. But that was fun and I got to work with some great actors like Julianne Moore and Jeff Bridges. And working with a big studio was exciting.

Once you do put the lid on fantasy, is there anything in particular you’d like to do next?

I’d like to move into this century. I’ve done a leading role now, so the important thing for me now is interesting stories. So I’m going to step back into playing a more supporting role in some interesting projects.

www.pompeiimovie.tumblr.com