Category Archives: Interviews

Wyatt Cenac brings “Brooklyn” Netflix special to live audiences

Photo by Eric Michael Pearson.

Photo by Eric Michael Pearson.

 

 

In his new Netflix special Wyatt Cenac: Brooklyn, Wyatt Cenac‘s observations of somewhat strange things that take place in his neighborhood are familiarly funny to the Union Hall audience. But when he takes these stories to other towns on the Wyatt Cenac Live in Brooklyn in ___(insert city name here)___ tour, audiences will likely agree that odd things happen pretty much anywhere. It just takes a certain type of perspective to find the humor in it all, which is what Cenac has provided as a writer for King of the Hill and The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. The tour runs Nov. 13-23, but first Cenac talks to Wrestling with Pop Culture about his special and how it might relate to people outside of Brooklyn.

Your recent Netflix special features stories and observations that are very specific to your home town. On this tour, will you be telling similar stories that are specific to each town in which you’re performing?

Yeah, it’s about Brooklyn. But I would argue that a lot of the things are relatable in any city that you live in. Just a weird experience [such as] seeing somebody bring a kid into a bar, I don’t think that’s a particularly Brooklyn thing. For me, part of doing the special is just talking about, yes, this is the place that I live. But I also think some of the shit in it is sort of relatable to any major city that has an artsy part of town where you see weird shit. As far as this tour, I’m just telling jokes about things from my life and things that I’ve seen.

I enjoyed the puppetry aspect of the special. Is that something you incorporate into your live shows?

No. That took a team of very talented people and it would be very expensive to try to take on the road. That was really more just for the visuals while watching the special. Watching a special on TV, you’re kind of seeing the most watered down version of it. The best version of seeing standup is actually being there. The second best is just listening to it. Seeing it on your TV, at any time you can check your email or do anything else and you’re just listening to it. So I felt like adding those elements with the puppets was a way to add some visual jokes that would keep you visually engaged with the special.

The Barclays Center comes up in your special. WWE held its TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs event there shortly after the arena opened in 2012, and has since returned there. Any chance you’ve attended any WWE events there?

No. I haven’t been to a pro wrestling event in a long time. I think the last time I went to one was when I was living in California because I had an agent at the time who was a big wrestling fan.

Do you happen to have any wrestling jokes or stories you can share with me?

When I was younger I watched a lot more wrestling, but I don’t watch it as much now. Every now and again I’ll get a few tweets directed my way whenever John Cena and Bray Wyatt are in wrestling matches against each other. The hashtag #WyattCena will come up and it’s a very strange thing because I’ll see tweets directed at me that will say things like, “Why is #WyattCenac trending? Oh, it’s not him. It’s a wrestling match.” That’s the one connection I have to it at this point in my life. One of the highlights of my time at The Daily Show was getting to meet Mick Foley. He’s a very nice guy.

A very nice guy who also now does standup. What was that experience like? Have you ever considered doing a comedy tour with him?

Wyatt Cenac Live in Brooklyn in ___(insert city name here)___We met twice and didn’t really get to spend a ton of time together. Once he came in right before we were shooting and we talked him trough what we were doing. He was happy to help out and was really nice. The next time I saw him, The Daily Show went to D.C. for the Rally to Restore Sanity and he was there. We never really chatted too much beyond that and I’ve never had a chance to see him do standup. He was entertaining the idea when I met him, but it was after my experiences with him that he started doing the tours.

In addition to The Daily Show, you also worked on King of the Hill. What were those experiences like for you and how does working for a TV show compare to doing standup?

They were both great. They’re both very different in that it takes about nine months to make one episode of King of the Hill versus The Daily Show, which takes about nine hours. So I learned two very different ways of making something: a fast one and a much more drawn out process with animation, which I’ve always been a fan of. They differ from standup because standup is my own thing, it’s my ideas that I can take out and see how they work. Working on someone else’s show, it’s their show, so you have to be able to write for somebody else. To do things for yourself is a little more satisfying creatively.

Tell me about the film you worked on with David Cross.

I shot a film that David Cross directed called Hits. I’m not sure when it’s getting released, but it went to Sundance this year and got a lot of good attention. So hopefully it will be out soon. And I’m doing these tour dates for the new special, and we’ll see what the New Year brings.

Ethanol expert David Blume gets “Pump”-ed up about alternative fuel

David Blume

David Blume

It’s no secret that foreign oil companies have quite a bit of economic and political power here in the United States. As a result, however, there are a few secrets those oil companies don’t want becoming common knowledge. With much of this information hiding in plain site, Pump is a documentary (narrated by Jason Bateman) that sets out to enlighten American fuel consumers on alternatives to gasoline and diesel fuel. Pump reveals the high octane history of how we have become so dependent on gasoline and oil, including an oil industry conspiracy that uprooted electric mass transit systems throughout the country in favor or gas-guzzling buses. The thing that gushes at me most about Pump, however, is the accessibility of alternative fuels, particularly alcohol-based fuels. Though there are several alternatives to gasoline, ethanol is available at many regular gas stations in the form of E85 (85 percent alcohol, 15 percent gasoline). According to ethanol expert David Blume, author of Alcohol Can Be a Gas! and one of the featured experts in Pump, ethanol burns much cleaner than gasoline, is better for our cars and is readily available. All you have to do is find gas stations in your area that offer E85 (there are numerous websites and smartphone apps that make this a very easy task) and fill up your tank. I found out from Pump that if your car has a yellow gas cap, it is a flex fuel car and can run on ethanol or gasoline. Of course there are ethanol detractors out there, so you should still do your research to figure out if E85 (or other alternative fuel sources) are right for you and your vehicle. But if it’s as simple as Blume makes it sound in this Wrestling with Pop Culture interview, joining this revolution couldn’t be easier.

How did you come to be involved with Pump?

Over the years, the filmmaker, Josh Tickell, and I were both advocates for alternative fuel. He was a vocal advocate for biodiesel, which is a vegetable oil-based fuel, and what I promote is alcohol fuel. His solution was useful for diesel engines and alcohol is useful for both gasoline and diesel engines. When Josh decided to make the film Pump, he knew that I was a leading expert in the field and had us help with the storyline, interviews and all kinds of things.

How did you become an expert in this field? What was it that drew you to finding out more about alcohol-based fuels?

Electric street cars were burned in the streets during the 1930s and 1940s as gas-guzzling buses replaced them.

Electric street cars were burned in the streets during the 1930s and 1940s as gas-guzzling buses replaced them.

Back in the ’70s I was studying ecology and biosystematics. One of my professors pointed to a bottle of fermenting beer in the lab and said, “That stuff could even run your car.” I didn’t believe him at all, so I went to the library to disprove his statement. What I found instead were all kinds of books about the technology of alcohol fuel starting in the 1800s and going forward. I found out the first automobiles all ran on alcohol. Gasoline wasn’t even invented yet. So, like you were saying, here was an instance where there was a whole hidden history we weren’t being told. That’s what hooked me back in the ’70s.

So you discovered it in the ’70s, but this history goes all the way back to the invention of automobiles?

That’s right. It’s not like someone said, “Oh, here’s a big pool of this gasoline stuff. I wonder if we can make an engine that would run on that.” No, that’s not how it came to be. Engines were already running on alcohol. They were used as stationary engines in mines to pull ore cars. They were used as heating and lighting all over the United States in rural areas. Everybody on a farm had a distillery, it was a basic piece of farm equipment and people primarily used apples to make alcohol prior to the 1920s or so. Every little farm had an apple orchard, but these were not apples like today where you could eat them and they were sweet and juicy. These were what we called “spitters” because you’d take a bite of an apple and spit it out because it was so bitter. But they made great alcohol and all apples were used for making either beverages or higher-strength alcohol for many, many uses: lighting, heating, disinfection, making medicines and extracts, and, of course, running farm equipment and vehicles in the late 1800s/early 1900s. The Model T, Henry Ford’s first production car, ran on both alcohol and gasoline, gasoline only as an afterthought because he knew the big market was in the agricultural areas and that’s where alcohol was. Gasoline came along later in the big cities produced by [John D.] Rockefeller. You could go out into the country, driving out on gasoline. But to get home you’d stop by any farm and buy alcohol. You just turned a couple of knobs and levers inside the cab of the car and you’d be running on alcohol. When you got back to the city, you’d put them back and be running on gasoline. So we have a long history of running on alcohol all over the world.

The movie explains why we rely on gasoline so much these days with fuel industry conspiracies based on making money. What do you think is the easiest way for people to learn more about alternative fuels and start enacting some sort of change in their routines to make a difference?

"Pump" predicts gas pumps  will look like this one in the near future.

“Pump” predicts gas pumps will look like this one in the near future.

I wrote the book Alcohol Can Be a Gas! to bring all this history and technology to light. So, go to your library and look up Alcohol Can Be a Gas! and you can learn all about this history, and learn how to make alcohol and/or use it in your car. The Fuel Freedom Foundation is a pretty good resource to opening our eyes to the alternatives to gasoline. But you yourself have a flex fuel car. That means your car was made at the factory to run on both alcohol and gasoline. You can put whatever you want in the tank and it will run just fine. There are 2,500 alcohol stations across the United States. So there are places almost everywhere – maybe only one or two in your city or town – that you’ll be able to get fuel. Compared to 120,000 stations that gasoline is sold at, it’s a small number. But they are spread out all over the country, throughout the Midwest for sure, but even on the West and East Coast.

After watching the movie I found several gas stations within a few miles of where I live that have E85 fuel.

What we didn’t talk about in the movie, because there were some concerns about whether there’d be liabilities, but it turns out current cars that aren’t made as flex fuel cars will run on up to 50 percent alcohol without a single change to the engine. That’s because modern fuel injection computers are very smart and they’re very flexible. In just about every case, they can go as high as 50 percent alcohol without any changes. So you have to find out what the maximum amount of alcohol you can use in your car is by experimenting to see. You put in a gallon the first tank, two gallons of alcohol the second tank and keep going until you start getting up to about 50 percent alcohol and 50 percent gas. Then you pay attention to how the car’s running. If it runs rough at idle or if it doesn’t quite have enough power at high speeds, you know you’ve reached the limit of how much alcohol you can put in the tank. So that’s the amount you put in in the future. What you’ll probably have to do in most places is fill up halfway with gasoline, then top the second half off with alcohol. So it’s a little more inconvenient. But more and more many of these alcohol stations have what are called blender pumps. So you can push a button and decide which proportion of alcohol and gasoline you want to put in your car. The thing about alcohol is it’s 106 octane. So it’s super premium. It’s really, really good for your car. You could put half alcohol and half regular in your car and you’ll still have 98 octane, which is still super premium. It’s much easier on the engine, it burns cooler, it burns pollution free and carbon free, so the inside of your engine stays bright and shiny and your oil never turns black. There’s no reason not to put alcohol in your car. Everything since ’83 has been designed to be tolerant of alcohol, so there are no problems with anything being incompatible with alcohol in your engine.

But if I have a flex fuel car with a yellow gas cap, I can fill up on E85 fuel without having to mix it with gasoline?

Ethanol is currently available at numerous gas stations throughout the country. Ethanol pumps are often marked in yellow or other colors to differentiate between them and gasoline pumps.

Ethanol is currently available at numerous gas stations throughout the country. Ethanol pumps are often marked in yellow or other colors to differentiate between them and gasoline pumps.

Yes, you can. You can run on straight alcohol fuel right from the pump. It’s called E85 at the pump, which means its 85 percent alcohol. That’s how we sell it in this country. In Brazil they sell E98, which is 98 percent alcohol. They don’t even bother adding gasoline to it because it’s a warm country. They only add gasoline to alcohol to make it easier to start on a cold morning. Alcohol is too safe. It doesn’t evaporate like gasoline does. The only problem with alcohol is that it makes it harder to start on a cold morning unless you have something volatile in the tank with it.

I really enjoyed this movie and I hope it enlightens more people, regardless of which type of alternative fuel they choose to seek out.

Well, the only one from the movie you can get now, practically, is ethanol or alcohol. The other fuels, you have to convert your car for $7,000 0r $8,000. Methanol is not sold anywhere at the pump right now. Electric cars, as you will surmise from the movie, are really not practical. Alcohol is something you can do today. The thing I’d like all of your readers to take home with them today is to go to fuelfreedom.org, which has a station finder that will tell you where the stations are near your home. Go today and put one gallon of alcohol in your tank so you can see that it runs just like it always did. That’s a gallon of fuel that you didn’t send your money to oil companies for. You sent it to American farmers, and that’s a good thing.

www.pumpthemovie.com

Sean McNamara’s “Field of Lost Shoes” is tragically triumphant

Having directed Disney Channel shows such as That’s So RavenKickin’ It and A.N.T. Farm, as well as live action film adaptations of toys and cartoons such as Casper Meets WendyBratz and Robosapien: Rebooted, Sean McNamara is an authority on preteen comedy. Having helped launch the careers of Shia LaBeouf, Jessica Alba, Hilary Duff and others, McNamara certainly knows how to discover and develop the talents of future stars. After his foray into more dramatic filmmaking with 2011’s Soul Surfer, McNamara presents another true story about children and teenagers facing very adult-oriented obstacles with Field of Lost Shoes. Having won the Best Dramatic Feature award at this year’s GI Film Festival, the film follows a group of Virginia Military Institute cadets as they are thrust into the Civil War despite their youth (and their conflicting moral convictions). Though the film stars established actors such as Tom Skerritt, Lauren Holly, Keith David and David Arquette, it’s the performances by younger actors like Luke Benward, Max Lloyd-Jones, Zach Roerig and Sean Marquette that really capture the tragically triumphant spirit of the film. With Field of Lost Shoes now playing in select theaters, Wrestling with Pop Culture talks to McNamara about working in the preteen film market, working with former World Heavyweight Champion wrestlers and what he has scheduled for release next year.

I saw Soul Surfer a few years ago and noticed that this film and that one are based on true stories and focus on adolescents who are facing enormous challenges. Is that a theme you particularly seek out?

Max Lloyd-Jones as Sam Atwill, Zach Roerig as Jack Stanard and Sean Maquette as Benjamin ‘Duck’ Colonna.  Photo courtesy of Bosch Media.

Max Lloyd-Jones as Sam Atwill, Zach Roerig as Jack Stanard and Sean Marquette as Benjamin “Duck” Colonna. Photo courtesy of Bosch Media.

I look for inspirational movies. From an age point of view, I had done Disney and Nickelodeon stuff, so I kind of know talent in that range. So having all the boys play these characters was an advantage because of my experience with that. I love every kind of movie that’s out there. A buddy of mine was a director of photography on Annabelle, which just came out last weekend. Horror movies, action movies, I like them all. But I see a lack of inspirational films like what I grew up with like Rocky where people do extraordinary things. I think we emulate what we see in movies. I’m not a boxer, but after seeing Rocky I definitely was running the next day getting ready for something and getting healthy. There is a place for movies that inspire kids. I’ve got three little boys of my own, 5, 6 and 11, and I just can’t imagine the thought of them going off to war. But it’s a reality for a lot of families. I come from a military background; my dad was a captain in the Navy, my brother was a captain in the Navy. I just think you’ve got to give people who want to go out and make a difference films to watch on a regular basis that are inspirational. For me it was RudyRockyRaiders of the Lost Ark, all the movies that start with R. But I do look for that. I’m constantly reading scripts and trying to find something that inspires people, even if it makes them sad. As you saw [in Field of Lost Shoes], they die at the end. But they were out trying to do something that they believed in. History proved different of who the victors were. But in any given conflict or war, there are young boys, even 18-22 I still consider super young, giving up their lives for an idea back in their country or homeland. My mission is to put out inspirational movies and try to make them entertaining so people will actually watch them and not feel like they’re eating spinach.

With this film you have a cast of well-known established actors alongside lesser known younger actors. Were there particular challenges working with each group? Did one group learn from the other? What was that dynamic like for you?

It’s always like that. The younger ones pick up stuff from the older ones. There was a show on the Disney Channel called Even Stevens that was Shia LaBeouf’s first TV show. The actor that I almost cast in that instead of Shia was Josh Zuckerman, who played Moses Ezekiel, the Jewish cadet that became an artist. So these kids have been around for 15 or 16 years already, full-on acting. You just don’t know their names yet. But they’re the future of entertainment. They’re really talented, they’ve been around it, they’ve had roles on Disney or ABC Family shows. Most of the actors I worked with – even Nolan Gould, he’s on Modern Family – they’re really talented. So I find the old guys learning from the new guys, the new guys learning from the old guys. On a nuts-and-bolts thing like doing a Civil War movie, the things they don’t know how to do like ride a horse or talk with a Southern accent, those are things you have to layer on and everybody is helping each other with that. So I could see the older actors working with the younger actors on their accents and those sort of things. But everybody loved working with each other and it was an adventure. It’s hard. Even with Soul Surfer, AnnaSophia Robb had never been on a surf board before and I had to make her good enough to look like she could hold a board and paddle. By the end of rehearsals she could strand up, but not like a pro surfer. With this movie I tried to make the boys hold a rifle right, to be able to march, things you wouldn’t think of but, when it’s done wrong, looks kind of silly.

Having worked with David Arquette on this film, you have now worked with two former World Championship Wrestling World Heavyweight Champions, the other being Hulk Hogan. Given what you were just saying about finding inspirational stories, are you a fan of professional wrestling and the inspirational scenarios that often play out in the ring?

David Arquette as Capt. Henry A. DuPont. Photo courtesy of Bosch Media.

Former WCW World Heavyweight Champion David Arquette as Capt. Henry A. DuPont. Photo courtesy of Bosch Media.

Absolutely. There was a movie that came out almost 15 years ago called Ready to Rumble that I was trying to direct, but Tollin/Robbins Productions did it. I actually did a pilot for a wrestling show. I love wrestling. It’s drama, it’s great performances, it’s people who really get into their bodies and build themselves up and get in a really healthy place. I would still love to do a great wrestling movie.

What was the wrestling show you wanted to do?

The pilot I did for Nickelodeon was called On the Ropes, which was half sitcom, half wrestling. It was really cool, it was very fun, but it didn’t get picked up.

You previously worked with Hulk Hogan on 1998’s 3 Ninjas: High Noon at Mega Mountain. What was it like working with him?

I loved it. He was a gentleman. He tried really hard to do his thing. Obviously he was in great shape. I remember this: he had 25 chicken breasts. Not 26, not 24, every day he ordered 25 chicken breasts for lunch. I could never understand what a weird number that was. But that was his thing. He introduced me to sushi in Denver, Colorado. But he was great. I went to see him wrestle in Vegas after we shot the movie. It was great and he brought a lot to [the movie]. Look at how many wrestlers are becoming great actors like The Rock. He’s starred in so many movies, but Baywatch is the latest one he’s going for. It’s going to be great because it’s going to be tongue in cheek.

Back to Field of Lost Shoes, it had a limited release on Sept. 26. Will it be expanding into more theaters or showing at film festivals?

It won Best Dramatic Feature at the GI Film Festival. It opened in 26 theaters last weekend. It was only supposed to be a limited release, but then you see how it’s played and if it can expand. So it is a slow release and they’re hitting the areas where they think it will do well.

You have some new films coming out next year. What can you tell me about those films and what you’re working on now?

Spare Parts comes out in January with Jamie Lee Curtis, Marisa Tomei and George Lopez. Again, it’s an inspirational true story based on the Wired magazine article “La Vida Robot” where four undocumented Hispanics built an underwater robot and ended up beating M.I.T. in a contest. Then they did it again. So it’s kind of a cool little inspirational movie with underwater robotics. Then I have another Soul Surfer-type, sort of Christian-based movie called Hoovey that comes out in February. On April 10 we have a big movie coming out called The Moon and the Sun with Pierce Brosnan, William Hurt and Kaya Scodelario, who just starred in The Maze Runner.

What do you mean when you say Hoovey is a Christian-based movie?

Sean Marquette as Benjamin ‘Duck’ Colonna, Nolan Gould as Robert, Luke Benward as John Wise, Zach Roerig as Jack Stanard, Max Lloyd-Jones as Sam Atwill, Parker Croft as Garland Jefferson and Josh Zuckerman as Moses Ezekiel. Photo courtesy of Bosch Media.

With Soul Surfer, they labeled it Christian. But I set out to do a mainstream movie about a surfer who just happened to be Christian. There are more religious things in the new Footloose, and the old Footloose, than there are in Soul Surfer. Because Hoovey is similar to that – it’s somebody who is a Chrisitian who is playing basketball and gets a tumor in his head, they cut it out and he goes back and becomes a star basketball player – I just know it’s going to be labeled that way.

There’s been a trend of “faith-based” movies as of late. Why do you think that is?

I think it’s becoming a business. There’s an audience out there that definitely won’t go see good, solid films if you put in a couple of curse words or too much nudity. I think what happened was somebody said, “Wait a minute. There’s this group of Christians that still want to go see good movies. If you just cut a couple of those things and tell a good story, they’ll go see it.” It doesn’t have to be a Bible-thumping story, it just has to be good. The ones that have just a little bit of Christianity in them are just exploding because that market wants it. They want to do something with their kids and teenagers and they don’t want them seeing R-rated movies. I think that’s why you’re seeing more because they’re starting to make a lot of money. And they’re getting better. Before, it was wannabe filmmakers who would write a story but didn’t have any real professionals around. Now they’re starting to put really talented people in these movies and getting really talented writers.

www.seanmcnamara.com

www.fieldoflostshoesfilm.com

Madeline Brumby talks monsters, makeup and more at Monsterama

Madeline Brumby

Photo by Ashley Anthony.

The Monsterama horror convention makes its debut in Atlanta Aug. 1-3 and brings with it a cadaverous cadre of horror legends and underground favorites. Featuring the likes of Space Ghost Coast to Coast‘s C. Martin Croker, Big In Japan writer Timothy Price, Monstrosity Championship Wrestling’s Professor Morté and Hammer scream queen Veronica Carlson, Monsterama is not likely to disappoint fans of horror films, comic books, literature, art and theater. But Monsterama also features a new generation of creatures ready to rise from their proverbial coffins. One such vixen is Madeline Brumby, who played Edna Marco in the cult favorite Dear God No!, danced as a Go-Go Ghoul in the Silver Scream SpookShow and has helped stave off the undead at Atlanta Zombie Apocalypse, among other spooky endeavors. As she prepares for a weekend of scream queens, monster makeup and other atrocities, she takes a moment to talk to Wrestling with Pop Culture about her burgeoning horror career and what her role will be at Monsterama.

What exactly is your role at the inaugural Monsterama? 

I just got involved pretty recently when Anthony Taylor asked me to be a guest, which I was excited about. He’s one of the creators and organizers of Monsterama. I have the opportunity this Friday to host a panel with Veronica Carlson, who was a Hammer star and a scream queen. We’re doing a panel talking about acting in horror films and what that was like. I’m really interested to hear what she has to say since she had quite a career that went on for many years. She did all sorts of productions for Hammer and was quite a striking looking woman. She was definitely in the prime time for horror films.

She obviously has a much more storied career than you’ve had at this point. I’m guessing you’ve drawn inspiration from quite a bit of her work. What do you anticipate when you host this panel with her?

Madeline Brumby (right) as one of Dracula's brides in the Little 5 Points Rockstar Orchestra's production of "Dracula". Photo by Stungun Photography.

Madeline Brumby (right) as one of Dracula’s brides in the Little 5 Points Rockstar Orchestra’s production of “Dracula”. Photo by DornBrothers.

I’ve definitely admired her. I imagine she’ll probably have a lot of behind-the-scenes stories that will be interesting about how her career started, how she fell into that kind of path. I fell into the horror path kind of by accident. It’s not that I had anything against it, it just kind of went that way. It seemed to be the thing that most people were trying to do independently. That’s how I found Dear God No!. I’m curious how she got started and that’s what I’d like to ask her about.

Tell me a little more about how you ended up in Dear God No! and the horror industry in general.

I was scrolling through auditions and casting calls and things like that and I stumbled across an audition log for Dear God No!. It was well written and the person who wrote this call was obviously intelligent, knew what they were writing about and there weren’t misspellings. Every single answer was posted for questions that all actors and actresses are looking for. Do you get paid? How long does it shoot for? What is the actual role? What is expected of the character? It said Edna Marco, kind of young, slightly abused female, some nudity required. I was like, “Sounds interesting. I’ll submit and see what happens.” Jimmy Bickert responded in, like, ten minutes. So, I was like, “Oh, OK. I guess they’re really looking for somebody. Maybe the script is great or not so great. Or maybe he really does like me.” It’s hard to tell when you’re young and not too familiar with how independent projects work. I didn’t know if it was some weirdo. I auditioned and got the role and that’s how I fell into Dear God No!.

I understand you had a career in biology prior to that, but were you already doing any acting before Dear God No!?

I was. I got my biology degree from Georgia Tech. I finished up with school and decided I did not want to pursue a field in medicine any more. I was much happier doing performing arts, being on stage or being in front of a camera. I had done a science fiction project, I had done drama projects, I had done small commercials and was just on the hunt for other projects until Dear God No! came along. That just changed everything. It was such an interesting group of people that were really pushing for the success of the film. It got me involved in a completely different world of people that was super awesome for me. I’d always liked horror and it just made a world of difference for me and my career.

Was that how you ended up working with the Silver Scream Spookshow and Atlanta Zombie Apocalypse?

Madeline Brumby

Photo by Jonny Rej.

I ended up falling in love with [horror artist/special effects expert] Shane [Morton]. At the time I was not involved with the Spookshow. Then the Spookshow kind of reassembled a few months after Dear God No! was filmed  and I was invited on to the Spookshow. I’ve always loved doing children’s theater and shows for kids. I enjoy their genuine response to theater, so I was really on board with that. Through Shane, I’ve certainly met all sorts of interesting people and learned a totally new skill set, which is doing makeup. I’m also helping with a panel at Monsterama with some other folks doing makeup.

That was actually my next question was how will Dear God No!, the Spookshow and AZA be represented at Monsterama? 

There is going to be a Spookshow. We’re showing The Valley of Gwangi and there will be a fun Spookshow just before that. We’re also showing Atlanta Zombie Apocalypse: The Movie at 11 p.m. on Friday. I’m helping with several makeup panels. It should be a really fun convention if you’re into literature, if you’re into film or if you want to see how to do some cool makeup.

Are there any other guests you’re excited about seeing at Monsterama?

I am excited about seeing Victoria Price, daughter of Vincent Price. It will be really interesting just to say, “Hello” to her and find out what it was like growing up with Vincent as her dad. She just seems like an interesting person and she’s been a huge supporter of her father.

www.monsteramacon.com

Nicola Peltz and Jack Reynor transform from indie darlings to Hollywood stars in “Transformers: Age of Extinction”

Transformers: Age of Extinction is, in many ways, a new beginning for the Transformers film franchise. As the name implies, there is a subplot about how the Transformers arrived on a prehistoric Earth inadvertently causing the extinction of the dinosaurs (hence the inclusion of the Dinobots). Following the events of Transformers: Dark of the Moon, Optimus Prime and the rest of the Autobots have gone into hiding to avoid being hunted down by distrusting government officials conspiring to end their existence. And with Megatron and the Decepticons apparently gone, a new threat arises that threatens extinction for humanity and Transformers alike.

Jack Reynor and Nicola Peltz co-star in "Transformers: Age of Extinction". Photo by Andrew Cooper.

Jack Reynor and Nicola Peltz co-star in “Transformers: Age of Extinction”. Photo by Andrew Cooper.

Age of Extinction is also a rebirth of sorts for the franchise in that it has an entirely new cast of characters played by actors new to the Transformers universe. Having starred in Michael Bay‘s Pain & Gain last year, Mark Wahlberg heads up this new cast as Carl Yeager (see what they did there?), a muscled-up mechanic who spends most of his time tinkering around in his Texas barn, creating impressively useless things such as a robotic guard dog and a mechanical butler that can’t quite make it all the way to the couch with your cold beer. Wahlberg spends a majority of the film evading evil robots and corrupt CIA agents with his alluring teenage daughter Tessa (Nicola Peltz) and her charming race car-driving boyfriend Shane (Jack Reynor). So, there’s no shortage of attractive people running through explosions, a favorite of Bay’s. Though I wish I could have talked to them after seeing the movie (I can think of several more things to ask now that I’ve seen it), Wrestling with Pop Culture was more than happy to talk to Reynor and Peltz before their transformation from indie favorites to Hollywood action stars.

Age of Extinction is the fourth film in the franchise and some are saying it’s a reboot because of the new characters and new story. What do you feel you bring to this franchise?

Reynor: The first thing I’ll say is this is certainly a sequel to the previous films. It picks up four years after the war in Chicago, which was the end of the third film. Our characters are very different from the previous ones. The Autobots are very different to what they were in the previous series because they’re in exile. Humanity is aware of them now, but doesn’t understand them and is very intolerant of this alien invasion, as they would probably put it. So, the Autobots have gone into exile and are kind of weary about humanity’s flaws, Essentially, the character dynamic between Mark, Nicola and myself tries to restore their faith in humanity. That is really what’s at the heart of the film and that’s what grounds the film. It’s trying to bring a fresh emotional truth to this particular project and to add some more layers than might have been there previously. Hopefully that’s something that’s going to translate in the finished product. So, that’s where we’re coming from with this one.

Working with such elaborate effects and working so much with a green screen, what were the biggest challenges in having to imagine these characters around you?

Photo by Industrial Light & Magic/Paramount.

Photo by Industrial Light & Magic/Paramount.

Peltz: Going into the film, I thought there was going to be a lot of green screen. But there really wasn’t. Obviously, Bumblebee and Optimus and all the Autobots are all fake. But all of Michael’s car chases and explosions, that’s all real. These magnificent sets, he really builds or were actually there. So, the only thing that is green screen are the Autobots and Decepticons and Dinbots. You got to use your imagination; it’s a lot of fun. The only thing that I can say was the most challenging was when you  have a scene where there are six robots and you just have to remember their eye-lines and almost memorize their lines and who is saying what so you know where to look. If we’re lucky, we get a silver pole [to look at]. If not, we get nothing.

Reynor: It’s funny because, like Nicola says, Michael makes all these explosions real, all these crashes real – all those big effects, most of them are practical. That’s something that’s very unique about his films and I think it’s responsible in no small part, perhaps, for the success of the films he’s made throughout the course of his career. That was a really great opportunity for us because we were shooting a big Hollywood blockbuster that wasn’t a green screen and it was very real and tangible for us while we were on set. At times it can be really terrifying. In terms of working with imaginary robots, when you’re an actor – be it in independent film, be it in television – you’re just asked to suspend your disbelief and draw on your imagination, draw on your emotions and these kinds of things. Giant robots are really just an extension of that. After a week or two of us being in this environment, we grew in confidence with Michael’s support and Mark’s support. Obviously, Mark shot Ted right before this, so he’s got an imaginary best friend. So, he was the first one to say, “Look, you guys just need to throw yourself in. It might feel silly to you, but if you’re not going to be the one to sell it on screen, the threat won’t translate and the intensity and action won’t be able to translate. It’s up to you to essentially convey all the emotion.”

As physically demanding as it is with all the explosions and stunts, did you guys go through any sort of training to prepare for that?

Peltz and Reynor do a lot of running in "Age of Extinction," here with Mark Wahlberg and Stanley Tucci. Photo by Andrew Cooper.

Peltz and Reynor do a lot of running in “Age of Extinction,” here with Mark Wahlberg and Stanley Tucci. Photo by Andrew Cooper.

Peltz: Yeah. We did boot camp for two months before filming. I’m so happy we did it because I did not realize how much running  is involved. We were running all the time. I think there’s two scenes where we’re either sitting in a car or – we’re never walking, we’re always running. So, it was so helpful for us to get in shape and be ready for whatever was to come on set.

Reynor: The days can be long. They can be, like, 14-hour days and there are some days that you’re on all of that time. If you’re going to be able to get through it without just being chronically exhausted, you’ve got to go to the gym and work out and you’ve got to be kind of at your peak fitness mentally and physically. So, Nicola and I just worked out as much as we could and I worked out with Mark a fair bit during the course of the film. It was really helpful to me. It really is a process you need to go through when you shoot one of these movies.

This year is the 30th anniversary of Transformers. I don’t know if that has anything to do with the timing of this movie’s release. Obviously, these stories and characters have evolved and gone through several retellings, including the previous three films. Were either of you fans of the cartoons or comic books? If so, how did those Transformers stories influence your performances in this film?

Reynor: We would have both grown up with Transformers. I certainly, in Ireland, watched the animated series on TV as a kid and had a whole line of the toys that I played with. I was a big fan of the films, too. But I’ve always been interested in the culture of it. I think it started in Japan and you can see a lot of their culture invested in Transformers, especially in the animated series. It’s been interesting to watch it translated to America over the last 30 years.

Peltz: I definitely grew up with Transformers. I’m a huge fan of what Michael’s done with these films and I was really exited to be part of one.

What was working with Mark Wahlberg like?

Peltz: Working with Mark was amazing. Everyone knows how talented he is, but he’s such a professional. He’s so hardworking and such a nice guy. Us being so new to the business and being able to learn from him and work with him, we really are lucky. He’s taught us a lot and I can’t say enough nice things about him. He’s great.

Wahlberg (left) and Reynor in "Age of Extinction". Photo by Andrew Cooper.

Wahlberg (left) and Reynor in “Age of Extinction”. Photo by Andrew Cooper.

Reynor: Yeah. He is a great dude. He’s really committed to what he does and very dedicated, like Nicola says. For us as young actors, we both come predominantly from an independent film background – Nicola’s obviously had [The LastAirbender and stuff, but I came straight from independent film – and to watch Mark in a Hollywood blockbuster environment and see his ability to relate to it in a meaningful way and how it relates to him informed our work ethic and aspirations and goals for ourselves and how we would want to go about them.

Being young actors coming from these independent backgrounds, how is it to join such a huge summer blockbuster franchise?

Peltz: Like we said, we are big fans of Transformers. So, it’s really exciting for us. When we found out they were even casting someone our age it was exciting. But to now be part of it and work with the people who created such amazing films like the first three is really exciting.

Reynor: I find it very difficult to make a comparison between independent film and blockbusters. It’s two completely different schools of thought and two different animals. It’s funny because I can relate to the filmmaking process while I’m there and doing it, but now that it’s being released and I’m seeing ads on TV and stuff, it’s almost like I don’t see myself in it. Maybe it hasn’t hit me yet, maybe it never will. I don’t know. It’s just a weird thing that I find it difficult to relate to in a way. But I’m still very proud to be part of it and I’m very glad to be here. It’s done incredible things for my career since I shot it, so long may it continue.

What were your initial reactions to seeing the trailers and stuff being that when you were filming it you had to imagine everything?

Peltz: It’s honestly insane. I remember specifically this one scene where it looks like Michael is [moving] a green rake. In the scene, I’m screaming and it just felt really silly. But I saw the scene for the first time finished with the CGI and it is crazy. I was not there with that robot, I was there with Michael and a rake. It’s just crazy how they made that. The technology these days is honestly mind blowing. It’s crazy.

Is there a particular scene you’re excited to see in the film?

Reynor: I think there’s a few. There’s one scene that I really enjoy in the film. At the heart of the film is this dynamic of Nicola and her transition from family life and living under her father’s roof to becoming an independent woman and having a relationship with this guy. There’s a scene where we’re on the [Silver Bullet Zephyr] train in a trainyard, sleeping for the night. It’s a really nice scene where Nicola’s asleep at the back and Mark and I are on our own. We’re very quiet and he just starts to explain that he’s not going to be around forever and he needs somebody to look after her and she’s not going to be able to do it all on her own. I don’t really say anything to him in the scene, but it’s a nice moment and a nice relief from all the intensity, action and insanity where everything quiets down for a minute. It’s a really important moment in the film, so I’m really excited to see that scene.

Photo by Andrew Cooper.

Photo by Andrew Cooper.

I’m excited to see that one massive explosion, which is going to be great. The final scene is beautiful, as well. We shot it Hong Kong harbor. Just aesthetically it’s so beautiful because Michael Bay knows how to capture sunlight like nobody else. Right at the end of the film, as we were shooting in Hong Kong harbor on the last day, the sunlight as the sun was going down was that Oriental red fireball in the sky. It just looked so incredible, so I think that’s going to look beautiful with the city as the backdrop.

Peltz: Like Jack said, Michael does action films like no other. It’s amazing to watch, and exciting. But in this film there are wonderful moments people can relate to and there’s a great human element to it. So I’m really excited to see those little moments as well as the crazy action scenes.

Were you under a lot of pressure to get it done right in the first take since you really only have room for one massive explosion?

Peltz: There was this one big explosion where the three of us are running and we had no warning. We got on set and we see these explosives everywhere and we see ten cameras, then Michael was like, “We’re doing this big explosion. It’s going to be you, Jack and Mark and you’re going to have to run from here to here in 4.6 seconds. You get a practice run. It took them a week to do it, so you can’t mess this up. It’s a one-take thing. Are you guys ready? You can’t mess this up.” It sounds so simple to run from here to here: all you’re doing is running. But it’s a lot of pressure and your adrenaline is through the roof. But it’s so fun when you’re in the moment and everything is just exploding around you.

Reynor: It’s not hard to sell in that moment.

Peltz: You feel the heat and it’s crazy. I would [otherwise] never experience anything like it. I’ve heard so many stories about how fast Michael moves on set and everything, but you almost have to experience it. That was really a fun day and crazy pressure.

Have you had a chance to give much thought to how being in this movie will affect your careers, especially given what being in the previous three movies did for those actors?

Reynor: I’ve been incredibly lucky. I haven’t stopped working since we made this movie. I’ve shot three films back to back since Transformers. One of them was an independent Irish film that I’ve wanted to finance for about a year and a half before I did Transformers with Toni Collette called Glassland, which was great. I moved on and made Macbeth with Michael Fassbender and Marion Cotillard, which was an incredible experience. Then I just made a movie there called Girls’ Night Out with Sarah Gadon and Bel Powley. It’s a fun movie about VE Day in 1945 in the U.K. So, even without Transformers being released, it’s given me an awful lot of ammunition in the industry and helped me to broaden and expand my career the way that I want to. I’m very grateful to the franchise for that, on top of many other things.

Coming from more dramatic pieces and coming into an action film like this, is there any difference in the way you approached this action role as opposed to your more dramatic roles?

Peltz: The great thing about acting, if we’re lucky enough, is we get to play a bunch of different characters. I approach each character differently because they’re different characters. But I didn’t approach this one differently just because it was an action film; I did because it’s just a different character than I’ve played before.

Reynor: I don’t think it’s a case of I’m taking off my drama hat and putting on my action hat. There’s a lot of really nice dramatic moments in the film and you still have to play those with the same kind of truth and commitment to the seriousness of an independent or dramatically-heavy film. That is an element of it, and at the same time you have to prepare yourself for the physicality of the action and the precision of shooting big, long action sequences.

www.transformersmovie.com

David Gordon Green and Tye Sheridan are two reasons why this film isn’t your average “Joe”

Joe is a contemporary Southern Gothic story about a down-on-his-luck man named Joe (Nicolas Cage) who, having a regrettable history, is trying to distance himself from his troubled past. After meeting an equally troubled, but optimistic, adolescent named Gary (Tye Sheridan), Joe somewhat reluctantly serves the role of father figure, giving Gary a job amongst his crew of day laborers, protecting him from his abusive father (the late Gary Poulter) and teaching hard-living life lessons to a kid who’s already done a good bit of living himself. The film (now available on Blu-ray and DVD) is based on a novel by Larry Brown and became a film festival and art house favorite. Before the movie’s recent Atlanta Film Festival opening night screening, Wrestling with Pop Culture got to talk to Sheridan and director David Gordon Green about their powerful cinematic creation.

Tye, his is the second year in a row you had a pretty major film in the Atlanta Film Festival, and your roles in Mud and Joe were pretty similar. What attracts to these roles where you play adolescent characters that have already done a lot of living?

Photo by Ryan Green.

Tye Sheridan in “Joe”. Photo by Ryan Green.

Sheridan: For a while the only thing I could get cast in was a Southern drama because people were like, “Ah, he has an accent. He won’t be able to do this film.” I was auditioning a lot, but these seemed to be the only films I was getting. But I really like these films because I was born and raised in Texas, my family’s from the South and I feel like I represent my family well. They like to see me in these films and it’s been fun.

As a director, what was it like directing a character like Gary?

Green: I’m always drawn to youthful roles. Most of my films have young characters in them and that’s something that’s always been appealing to me. When I saw Tye’s first performance in Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life, it really caught my eye as somebody to watch out for. That was my favorite part of that movie was, as epic and spiritual as the movie got, for me it was kept grounded by this portrait of youth. I really loved what Tye did in that. Then I was in the editing room on Mud when Jeff [Nichols] was putting that together and I just watched as that movie was being assembled [and thought], “OK, he’s really taking the next step and becoming a strong young actor.”

It’s nice to have an actor with acting ability, but I certainly don’t need it. I’ve spent a lot of my career working with non-actors and nontraditional performers. Formal acting experience and training means very little to me. But finding the right face and voice means everything. I saw hundreds of kids that came in and auditioned … but what Tye had was the physicality, the life experience, the accent and he really understood the core of this character and could relate to not only the region where the character’s from, but how these domestic situations would affect a kid of that age realistically. That’s so much more important to me is an actor that brings you ideas and value rather than just memorize the script and tell you what you want to hear. This is a story based on the legendary Larry Brown’s wonderful piece of literature. But at the same time, a movie is a movie and we’re trying to find the naturalism and breath life into the words that are spoken, the images that are shot. And Tye did an excellent job of bringing Gary Jones to life.

Given the nontraditional means by which you tend to make your films, what was the rehearsal process like for Joe?

David Gordon Green directing "Joe". Photo by Linda Kallerus.

David Gordon Green directing “Joe”. Photo by Linda Kallerus.

Green: A traditional rehearsal process would be of interest in specific projects, if I was going to do an adaptation of a Shakespeare play or something that I think there’s a value to those words. For me, the rehearsal process is the value to these characters and their relationships. So, my rehearsal is let’s go out and get beer and pizza and introduce Tye to Nicolas Cage. Tye wasn’t drinking beer. He was drinking Pepsi. But, you know, lighten up, get to know each other, find out what makes us tick and make it so that I’ve got the psychological tools to do my job, to pull what I find is natural and comfortable out of an actor. It’s not memorizing lines, looking into mirrors and ping-ponging how we’re going to block it. I want this to be intuitive and instinctive.

So there’s a bit of improvisation involved?

Green: There’s a substantial amount of improv. The whole sequence with Tye and Nic as they’re driving around and Nic had this idea of, “Hey, I have this lighter. Charm them with the lighter and tell them about my cool face.” All that stuff is the humanity of Tye and Nic knowing each other and coming up with weird ideas. Some of my favorite lines of the movie aren’t in the script; it’s just two actors that know how to riff and have fun with it.

You just mentioned how you like to use people who aren’t actors. I understand the late Gary Poulter was homeless before starring in this film. How did you find him?

Green: My casting directors met him at a bus stop in downtown Austin. He’d been without an address for a number of years and we brought him in. He originally auditioned for the guy cutting up the deer in one scene. I was like, “Great! That’s awesome. That’s a one-day role. I want you to try the two-day role of the guy who runs the convenience store, Mr. Coleman. Do you want to read for Mr. Coleman?” He comes in the next day and, “Alright, you nailed Mr. Coleman, too. Fantastic. I have a weird idea. You want to read for the third lead in the movie that we’re talking to big-name actors and getting submissions from Hollywood agents about?” Some very well respected actors were up for the role and I was talking to them seriously about doing it. So he comes in a few days later and just nails  it. He brought something electric to it that I couldn’t deny. People talk about the risk involved and we certainly had some concerns and wanted to make sure the guy was happy and healthy and in a good situation. We discovered he was making smart decisions for himself, cleaning up his act and working hard to redeem himself, yet could bring some of the demons of his life to the role and use it to kind of exorcise those. So it was a real positive experience for all of us, working with Gary.

Was that intimidating for you, not working with a trained actor?

Nicolas Cage and Tye Sheridan in "Joe". Photo by Linda Kallerus.

Nicolas Cage and Tye Sheridan in “Joe”. Photo by Linda Kallerus.

Sheridan: I wouldn’t say intimidating, but it definitely keeps you on your toes. That’s something that’s always been a passion of mine is improvising. David mentioned how we would throw each other ideas and improv a little bit and just kind of feed off of each other. That’s one of the coolest things about acting. He was a really good actor and such a sweet guy and a good person. I wish he would have made it long enough to see the final cut. It breaks my heart.

Green: That whole scene when Gary is popping and locking and breakdancing, that’s all just Gary and Tye freestyling with two cameras on. We let them loose and they just came up with all of that. Ultimately, actors don’t necessarily have to have gone to Juilliard and had formal training. An actor is a person with charisma and confidence and something to offer. I would be a terrible actor because I get very self conscious in front of microphones, much less cameras. But Gary had those things to exhibit and it was amazing to be able to have the opportunity to explore that with him in a brief chapter of his life.

How did you prepare for this role that involves and abusive father and other hardships?

Sheridan: Preparation for a role is different each time you do a film or a different character. I read this script a couple of times and I really loved it and really felt in tune with what the story was and who the characters were. So, I didn’t really want to mess with that until I got into rehearsal with Nic and David. Then we started figuring out the characters. I don’t feel like you can fully understand the character until you’re in his clothes, in his house and on set.

Green: That’s how we began production was with that [opening] scene. It was kind of an interesting initiation into my process, in a weird way, to let Tye and Gary get into the most difficult scene in the movie on the first day of production. It was important for me to use that as the foundation for how these characters connect to each other. Again, it’s loosely scripted, but it’s really heightened by the gusto of these two performers. So we could always refer back to that through the whole movie, even during the lighthearted scenes.

I get the impression a lot of the members of the work crew are also not traditional actors. 

Sheridan: A lot of them are not actors. Can you tell who was an actor and who wasn’t.

No, I can’t say that I could.

Sheridan: Good. That means David’s done his job. I think he did a great job of balancing actors and non-actors.

What was it like working with so many people who aren’t traditional actors and why is that important to you, especially in a film like Joe?

David Gordon Green directs Nicolas Cage in "Joe". Photo by Linda Kallerus.

David Gordon Green directs Nicolas Cage in “Joe”. Photo by Linda Kallerus.

Sheridan: It’s really cool. You don’t get that opportunity a lot in most films. That’s one of David’s signature moves is casting non-actors. It keeps you on your toes because they’re always improvising and saying things. Half the time they don’t even know what they’re doing and you just have to roll with it.

Green: It depends on the role. For a role like Joe, you need that gravitas, you need a movie star, you need somebody that brings a resume and a perception about himself, and Nic fit those shoes really well. Other times you need guys that are playing laborers and I wanted them to speak the vernacular and swing an ax the way that a hard-working man would. So it was good to go down to day labor centers and places where we could find the real deal and guys that I can learn from, guys that I’m not telling them what to say or how to say it. They can say their thing, do their thing and make it feel authentic.

So which ones were and were not “real” actors?

Sheridan: There was one crew worker named Sammy who was an actor. He was the only one out of the work crew. Actually, I think they had to cut a couple of his scenes because you could kind of differentiate between him and the rest of the crew being an actor with non-actors. Originally there was a scene where he and Joe get into a fight, but they had to cut that one.

How was Austin as a shooting location for you?

Green: The novel takes place outside of Oxford, Mississippi, which is a beautiful backdrop and something we considered doing. It’s Larry Brown’s neck of the woods and it was a very personal project for him. I had just recently moved to Austin and was exploring my own back yard and it felt like the right place. I knew I had the resources to tap into an authenticity here and find unexploited voices and unseen locations and things like that. I felt a great stability by being able to make a movie this difficult, which was challenging in a thousand ways, but be able to sleep in my own bed at night and be able to ground myself and center myself by not necessarily being a foreigner in a community, but being familiar with it.

Did you and Nic really go out and do location scouting?

Nicolas Cage and Tye Sheridan in "Joe". Photo by Ryan Green.

Nicolas Cage and Tye Sheridan in “Joe”. Photo by Ryan Green.

Green: Yeah. I wrote him a letter and said, “Hey, man. I want you to read this script. I’d love to talk to you about this project.” Cage was on my mind from the get go because Robert Mitchum had passed away and this was the only person I thought could fill his shoes, that had that kind of physical charisma, humor within him and dramatic ability. He called me maybe three days after I’d sent the letter and he’d read the book twice already. This dude was pumped. He was like, “I’m getting on a plane and coming to see you.” I was like, “Whoa, whoa! Wait. I’m location scouting for this other movie.” He was like, “I’m coming. Get the baby seats out of the backseat because I’m laying down.” So he came out and it was fun. We just drove around looking for locations for the Prince Avalanche project I was preparing to film at the time and we just got to know each other and talked about Joe and talked about Larry Brown and wandered around the trees. It would be fun because we’d be off on a little day hike and he’d come across a crew of road workers that would be re-seeding the state park after it had burned and he’d walk up and ask some of the work crew questions about it. Then they’d turn around and see Nicolas Cage and you’d see the stunned road crew. It was amazing.

A lot of your earlier stuff was drama. What made you want to go back to dramas after all the big comedies you’ve been doing?

Green: Ideally we would go back and forth. I’ve done a few movies, then we had a really nice run with our HBO series Eastbound & Down, where I could do a movie, then a season, a movie, then a season. Going from comedy to comedy, I’d get drained. I’m always digging for new things to make me laugh and that would be appropriate for comedic material. Drama, I’ve got wells of it. I’ve got wells of emotion, so I use comedy as a way to recharge because I don’t want to be stuck in a gloomy, melancholy head all day. Nobody does. So you go into it and make things as honestly and sincerely as you can in the dramatic world, then you lighten up with some absurdity. If that’s jumping into a Pineapple Express after a Snow Angels or jumping into an Eastbound & Down season three after Avalanche and right before Joe, wrap Joe and jump into season four of Eastbound, then jump into this [Al] Pacino drama that I just finished filming; it’s a fun way to lighten it up. It’s important for my sanity, more than anything, to keep a healthy balance of expression and expulsion.

Being a younger actor, what keeps you grounded and out of the tabloids and TMZ?

Sheridan: No one really cares about me. I live at home with my parents and have great parents. They’re both really supportive of my career and what I want to do in life. They’re my backbone.

As a young actor, who are some of the actors that inspired you or that you look up to?

Sheridan: When I got into film I was very young. I was at an age where I wasn’t even interested in film, so I think the first actors I looked up to were the ones I was working with, which was Brad Pitt, Sean Penn and Jessica Chastain. Jessica Chastain became, like, my second mom after I shot this movie called The Tree of Life. We remained really close and she’s a really good friend of mine.

Are there any actors you’d like to work with in the future?

Sheridan: I’ve always wanted to work with James Franco. There’s been a couple of things where it was, like, almost. But his schedule didn’t work. He’s doing a lot of stuff and I just think he’s a really interesting person and a bit of a mystery.

There’s a pretty gruesome dog fight scene in Joe. How did you pull that off? Were they trained dogs?

Green: You see dogs all the time as they play. You just get two mean-looking dogs, have them play and replace the sound effects with mean sound effects, then shoot it in slow motion so you can’t see the wagging tails as much. They’re not the smiliest of dogs. Nicolas’ dog Faith was a discovery, she was a new performer. The other dog she goes to play with was a professional dog because he had to do some very savage thing on camera and close up. So we wanted to make sure that was somebody we all felt good about. Particularly me because while I was location scouting for the movie, probably wandering where I shouldn’t, and I got bitten on the hand by a dog. It was pretty brutal. I’d never been attacked by a dog before. It was pretty interesting. And I was just being sweet and trying to pet it!

www.joefilm.net

Kit Harington does battle with gladiators, politicians and a volcano in “Pompeii”

Milo (Kit Harington) prepares for battle in “Pompeii”. Photo by George Kraychyk.

Best known for his role as Jon Snow in Game of Thrones, Kit Harington is no stranger to fantasy period pieces involving sword fights and fair maidens. But one thing Harington was not accustomed to prior to Pompeii was being the lead actor in a film set amidst a historical disaster that involves political scandal, romance and an uneasy alliance with a fellow gladiator. It’s a difficult balancing act that Harington is able to convincingly pull off as he falls in love with a princess, does battle with Rome’s best gladiators and awaits the eruption of Mount Vesuvius. With the movie now in theaters, Wrestling with Pop Culture chats with Harington about ThronesPompeii and other  upcoming projects.

You started your career on stage, made the jump to TV and now you’re in your first starring film role in Pompeii. What has that process been like? How has each of these experiences prepared you for the next?

It’s been very lucky and it’s been a kind of organic experience. I came from a very theatrical background with classical theater training and expected to find most of my work in British TV. To go from a great leading role in theater, make the jump to American TV, then to be doing films was a strange leap to make. It doesn’t usually happen that way. Now I find myself wanting to return to British projects as much as I can. But it’s been a thrilling ride and this movie, especially getting to play a lead role, was a box to be checked. I really wanted to have lead roles in the future, so proving I could do one was important to me.

Game of Thrones and Pompeii are visually similar, which I’m guessing helped you get the role in Pompeii. How would you say your character on Game of Thrones compares to Milo?

Photo by George Kraychyk.

Photo by George Kraychyk.

I think they actually are quite fundamentally different people. They obviously look similar and they’re both sword-wielding heroes, to an extent. So being on Thrones did help me get this part. But I think whereas my character on Thrones is driven by honor and duty and doing right by people, what appealed to me about this character was that he’s none of those things. He’s purely driven by rage, vengeance and a desire to kill and eventually be killed. It’s kind of a death wish and I liked that in him and the change that happens to him in the movie. Encountering another gladiator and falling in love changed his outlook on things. I think that was the intriguing thing about this character.

Milo develops a bond with Atticus (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje), but has an inevitable clash with him in the near future. How did you balance this rage and fury with the compassion Milo begins to develop for Atticus and the romantic relationship that develops with Cassia (Emily Browning)?

It’s important not to look at him in a modern sense. He’s a man from a different world, a different period, and his family had been killed. So I didn’t want to make him emotionally connected as we know it. He’s a very simple human being in lots of ways, and not exactly an intelligent man as we know it. I thought that was quite appealing and I quite enjoyed that. He has a way of looking at life in the film that’s unique in lots of ways to anything else I’ve seen or read. There are some slightly philosophical discussions that happen about the purpose of it all, then the volcano goes off and renders all life pointless anyway. It’s not your classic love story and it’s not your classic disaster movie in many ways.

You were in the original stage production of War Horse. Were you considered for that role when the film version of War Horse was released a few years ago?

Photo by Caitlin Cronenberg.

Photo by Caitlin Cronenberg.

I was considered for it, but I couldn’t even really contemplate doing it if I’d been offered it, which I wasn’t, because I was buried within Game of Thrones by then. And I felt that I’d finished my journey with War Horse, so it never really came up because it wasn’t something I had decided to do.

Game of Thrones is obviously still a hit, but do you have any other film or TV projects lined up after Pompeii?

I’ve got a few projects coming out. How to Train Your Dragon 2 is an animated movie that comes out in June that I’m doing a voiceover in. There’s a movie called Seventh Son reportedly coming out next year sometime. Season four of Thrones is coming out this year, and hopefully another season of that. And I’m working on a couple of movies this year, which I can’t talk about at the moment, but they should be quite exciting.

Seventh Son appears to be another fantasy based movie.

Yeah. I feel like I need to put the lid on fantasy for a little while. But that was fun and I got to work with some great actors like Julianne Moore and Jeff Bridges. And working with a big studio was exciting.

Once you do put the lid on fantasy, is there anything in particular you’d like to do next?

I’d like to move into this century. I’ve done a leading role now, so the important thing for me now is interesting stories. So I’m going to step back into playing a more supporting role in some interesting projects.

www.pompeiimovie.tumblr.com